Introduction

Play fairway analysis of geothermal resources across the state of Hawaii: 1. Geological, geophysical, and geochemical datasets

Play fairway analysis of geothermal resources across the state of Hawaii: 1. Geological, geophysical, and geochemical datasets

CP-2018-19
Play fairway analysis of geothermal resources across the state of Hawaii: 1. Geological, geophysical, and geochemical datasets

Lautze, Nicole, Donald Thomas, Nicholas Hinz, Garrett Apuzen-Ito, Neil Frazer, and David Walker.

Geothermics 70:376–392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.02.001 (2017)

Phase 1 of a Play Fairway Analysis (PFA) of geothermal resource potential across the State of Hawaii was recently completed. The final products of this work include a statewide geothermal resource probability map, a map of confidence in this probability, an assessment of the viability of development in areas of interest, and a prioritized list of recommended future exploration activities. The intersection of subsurface heat (H), permeability (P), and fluid (F) is necessary for an optimum geothermal play. This study: (1) identified and compiled all legacy and current data relevant to Hawaii’s geothermal resource; (2) ranked these datasets in terms of their relevance to subsurface H, P, F; (3) developed a Bayesian statistical method to incorporate the data and their rankings, and produce a statewide resource probability map; (4) developed a method to assess confidence in the probability values; and (5) assessed what we term ‘development viability’ in resulting areas of interest across the state. This paper details the basic project workflow, and activities (1) and (2). It describes the rationale for including this study’s datasets: surface geologic mapping data (calderas, rift zones, volcanic vents, dikes, faults), groundwater data (temperature, Chloride:Magnesium, SiO2) and geophysical data (gravity, magnetotelluric, seismic, geodetic strain), and justifies their relative rankings in terms of H, P, and F. A second paper by Ito et al. (2016) describes activities (3) and (4) related to the statistical methodology, and a third paper (Lautze et al., 2017) describes activity (5), the development viability criteria, as well as our suggested roadmap for future exploration activities. Overall, we find that the likelihood of abundant of geothermal resources is highest on the youngest island of Hawaii, but groundwater indicators suggest there may also be resources on the other, older islands. The higher demand for renewable energy on the more populated islands of Maui and Oahu, as well as a high viability of development on Lanai, also motivate further exploration on these islands.