Sequential Anaerobic-Aerobic Biodegradation of PCBs and PAHs in Phytoremediation Cuttings Using Slurry Reactors and Composters

SPONSOR:
Environet, Inc.

PROJECT PERIOD:
05/01/02 – 10/31/03

ABSTRACT:
The use of phytoextraction for clean-up of soils contaminated with heavy metals is an attractive alternative to excavation and treatment/removal operations that is quite well documented (Raskin, 2000). The use of plants to extract toxic organic compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from contaminated soils had not been well documented and constituted this research topic. However, there was preliminary evidence that phytoextraction of PCBs had occurred at a Haiku Valley contamination site. At the time, there was no evidence that PAHs have been phytoextracted by the plant species at the site. In addition, there was evidence that a rhizosphere concentration phenomenon had occurred at the Haiku site whereby PCBs are present at higher concentrations in the vicinity of plant roots than in the bulk soil (analyses for PAHs in the rhizosphere has not been done).

The transfer of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and PAHs into plant tissue via phytoextraction followed by harvesting the plant biomass was the first step in an overall treatment scheme. Additional treatment and/or disposal of the harvested biomass was carefully considered. Harvested biomass were incinerated or buried at approved facilities or treated biologically. Treatment options that include biological mineralization are often the most cost effective and are usually favorable compared to incineration or burial without treatment. In addition to phytoextraction, there are other possible methods for clean-up of soils contaminated with PCBs and PAHs. These include direct biological treatment of the soil either in situ or following excavation under aerobic and/or anaerobic conditions. Different methods such as soil slurry reactors, bioventing, composting and many other processes had been investigated.

The complete biodegradation of PCBs is not simple because it requires the actions of an acclimated consortium of microorganisms. PCBs with five or fewer chlorine atoms are subject to some degree of biotransformation (less than complete biodegradation) under aerobic conditions (Quensen, 1990). This aerobic degradation has been shown to occur by a consortium under co-metabolic conditions (Adriaens, 1989, 1990). Under anaerobic conditions, reductive dechlorination of highly chlorinated PCBs (including Aroclor 1254 and 1269) is possible (Morris, 1992). This suggests a two-stage treatment process in which anaerobic reductive dechlorination is used to initiate degradation of the heavily chlorinated PCB congeners, followed by aerobic degradation of mono- and di-chlorinated congeners (terminal products of the higher chlorinated congeners).

Sequential anaerobic dechlorination followed by aerobic mineralization had been documented (e.g. Bowlds, 1992; Anid, 199 1; Guiot, 1998) but not extensively. Similarly, multiple ring PAHs such as benzo(a)pyrene are generally very slow to degrade aerobically but may be susceptible to sequential anaerobic-aerobic degradation. To date, documentation of research in which phytoextracted contaminants have been biodegraded in an anaerobic or aerobic process had not been found in the literature.

Reductive dechlorination of PCBs is achieved through a consortium of select microorganisms that may not be present in natural soils that are not contaminated with PCBs. Thus, the best place to find the requisite organisms is at contaminated sites. There is evidence that analog substrate enrichment (with biphenyl) may speed-up degradation of some PCBs such as Aroclor 1242 (Brunner, 1985) but biphenyl did not seem to help with Aroclor 1254 (Rhee, 1993). There may be other so-called “Inducer compounds” (Babcock, 1993) which may provide enhanced degradation rates for Aroclor 1254. Some researchers have found that it may be essential to have sediment present for significant PCB dechlorination (Monis, 1992). The sediment may provide some carbon or growth factor or immobilized cell support. Little data was available on composting of PCB contaminated soils.

However, it is logical that a sequential anaerobic-aerobic composting operation could biodegrade PCB-contaminated soils and/or biomass. PAH-contaminated soils have been composted with some degree of success (McFarland, 1992).

This study consisted of laboratory-scale research to investigate two different technologies for remediation of PCB and PAH contaminated soil. Technology 1 was based upon the premise that phytoextraction would be a viable method for removal of soil-bound PCBs (and PAHs) and would consist of slurry reactors operated in sequential anaerobic-aerobic mode to treat actual plant cuttings from the Haiku site with and without PCB and PAH spikes. Technology 2 was based upon the premise that it may have been most feasible to treat a combination of plant biomass and rhizosphere soil directly and would consist of an enclosed composter that would be operated in sequential anaerobic-aerobic mode. Laboratory reactor systems were constructed and operated with adequate controls (spiked water, killed biomass). The model compounds that were utilized in any spiking experiments were Aroclor 1254 and benzo(a)pyrene. The reactor systems were operated for at least 6 months.

Description and Scope of Work:

The primary objective of this research project was to demonstrate PCB mineralization (Aroclor 1254) in the presence of phyto-plant cuttings during sequential anaerobic-aerobic treatment under controlled laboratory conditions in both slurry-type reactors and composters. A secondary objective was to determine the fate of benzo(a)pyrene under the reaction conditions found to be acceptable for PCB mineralization.

PCBs are a family of compounds produced by chlorination of biphenyl which produces a mixture of “congeners.” PCBs were manufactured in complex mixtures by several companies including Monsanto which used the trade name “Aroclor.” The Aroclor product number reflected composition, i.e. Aroclor 1254, indicates 12 carbon atoms and 54% chlorine. Aroclor 1254 is considered one of the more toxic PCB mixtures due to its high chlorine content. In this study, commercial grade Aroclor 1254 was utilized as the model compound mixture for spiking experiments. This was in addition to the actual aged/weathered PCB mixture present in the Haiku site soils and plant cuttings. The second model compound was commercial grade benzo(a)pyrene.

Each PCB mixture (i.e. Aroclor 1254) consists of >60 different congeners making analytical quantification challenging. Many PCB fate studies have not adequately quantified PCB degradation products or demonstrated biodegradation. It is not adequate to simply monitor the disappearance of one or two specific congeners because without adequate controls, abiotic losses (adsorption, volatilization, and photolysis) could account for some or all of the removal. In this study, we monitored the concentration of a whole series of PCB congeners. Once biodegradation occured as predicted, during the first treatment step (anaerobic dechlorination), the quantity of highly chlorinated congeners (tetra-, penta-, hexa-) systematically decreased and a concomitant increase in lower chlorinated (mono-, di-, and tri-) congeners remained (this provided a chromatogram that looked distinctly different from one describing abiotic losses).

Then, during the second treatment step (aerobic mineralization), the quantity of tri-, di-, and monochlorinated congeners sequentially decreased. While there were some compounds that accumulated, however, most mineralized. The best way to have conclusively demonstrated mineralization was to use C14 labeled PCBs, to collect off-gases, and determine the mass of C14 present in the gas phase, the liquid phase, and incorporate it into cell mass using scintillation counting. However, since we did not want to use radioactive chemicals, we used a combination of GC/ECD and GC/MS/’MS to accurately quantify liquid-phase and adsorbed phase PCB and daughter product concentrations throughout the treatment phases. In addition, adequate controls were used to determine abiotic losses (spiked water, killed biomass). This study did not quantify toxicity of plant cuttings or soil before or after biotreatment.

Slurry reactor experiments were conducted in 160-mL serum bottles with Teflon-lined septa and aluminum crimp tops. The bottles were placed in a temperature-controlled orbital shaker. Serum bottles contained mineral media, a carbon source, a PCB spike, a microbial inocula, and phyto-cuttings. The mineral media composition is given in Table 1 below. Methanol or acetone were added to anaerobic bottles as a carbon source to induce anaerobic activity which were measured by gas production. Biphenyl was added to some aerobic bottles to determine if analog enrichment would enhance biodegradation rates and/or reduce initial lag periods. The PCB spike consisted of commercial grade Aroclor 1254 at either 500, 100, 10, or 0 mg/L. Anaerobic microbial inocula consisted of either 1-2 grams of contaminated soil, a few ml of sludge from an anaerobic digester, or a combination of both.

The anaerobic control did not receive an inoculum. Aerobic microbial inocula consisted of either 1-2 grams of contaminated soil, a few ml of activated sludge, or a culture of Pseudomonas strain LB400. The aerobic control did not receive an inoculum. Some aerobic bottles were started concurrently with the anaerobic bottles in an attempt to develop enrichment cultures capable of degrading tri-, di-, and mono-chlorinated PCB congeners. These bottles were spiked with mixtures of commercially available 4-chlorobiphenyl, 4,4′-dichlorobiphenyl, and 3,4-dichlorobiphenyl. Gas production volume was measured by periodic insertion of a needle connected to a gas-tight syringe. The anaerobic and aerobic slurry reactors were operated for at least 6 months.

Composting experiments were conducted in stoppered 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The flasks were placed in a temperature-controlled orbital shaker. Composter flasks contained contaminated soil (with root material), a carbon source, a bulking agent (compost, straw, etc.), a PCB spike, a microbial inocula, and phyto-cuttings. The composters were operated similarly to the slurry reactors.

Table 1. Mineral Media Composition

Mineral mg/L
(NH4)2HPO4 80
NH4CI 1000
K2HPO4 200
NaCl2 10
CaCl2 10
MgCl 250
CoCl2 * 6H2O 1.5
CuCl2* 2H2O 0.2
Na2MoO4* H2O 0.23
ZnCl2 0.19
NiSO4* 6H2O 0.2
FeSO4 * 7H2O 1.0
AlC13* 6H2O 0.4
H3BO3 0.38

The workplan was as follows:

1.

    • Obtained contaminated soil samples and phyto-plant cuttings from Haiku site

2. Created adsorption “Isotherms” using Aroclor 1254 and several different shredded plant cuttings from the Haiku site. Repeated with benzo(a)pyrene. This provided an estimate of the absorbability of the PCB and PAH on the plant tissue.

3. Operated anaerobic dechlorination slurry reactor bottles with plant cuttings and added Aroclor 1254 and necessary nutrients, inducer compounds (i.e. biphenyl) and/or microorganisms as needed; monitor degradation kinetics and degradation product composition using gas chromatography with ECD and/or MS detection. After acceptable performance with PCBs was achieved, added benzo(a)pyrene to reactor(s) and determined its biodegradation under the same conditions.

4. Operated aerobic slurry reactor bottles with effluent from anaerobic reactors (and spiked with mono- and di-chlorinated biphenyls); added nutrients, inducers, and microorganisms as necessary; monitored degradation kinetics and degradation product composition gas chromatography with ECD and/or MS detection.

5. Operated laboratory composter flasks with PCB contaminated soil mixed with bulking agent, added nutrients, inducer compounds and microorganisms as necessary in anaerobic-aerobic sequential mode; monitored degradation kinetics and degradation product composition.

6. Estimated scalability and full scale costs.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Roger W. Babcock

Professor, Water Resources Research Center
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering

Office: Holmes Hall 346
Phone: (808) 956-7298
Fax: (808) 956-5014
E-mail: rbabcock@hawaii.edu
Related web page: View